uss iowa vs yamato

Yep, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation. ..but when I was a kid, it wasn’t about whether a ship was “better” than another. One other main problem of the Yamato vs Iowa: target size. Yamato and Musashi, the largest and most powerfully built ships in history (although perhaps at some disadvantage relative to the American Iowas) utterly outclassed the … The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a standard rail car. Here was perhaps the Iowa’s biggest advantage. williamcarter1993. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. Japanese fire control radar was poor, while American fire control radar was the best in the world. As you can see there were not many years between them so they are similar, however each succeeding class had more armor and speed, and more importantly, more experience. That doesn't account for the MASSIVE "pagoda" tower of the Yamato, … The Yamato-class was built for a different era of warfare. Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. And this is happening. But what if they had, in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans? So which battleship would win? U.S. Navy photo. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. Battleship Showdown: Hitler's Bismarck vs. America's Iowa-Class Battleship (Who Wins?) NOTE: The Yamato was outfitted slightly differently over the course of the war. While the British battleships couldn’t score a killing blow on the Bismarck, they did reduce the Bismarck to an inoperable wreck that was finally scuttled by her crew to prevent capture. The Nuclear shells were a much later cold war development. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. A fully armed shell, even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and other nations. But be it as it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa. USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Report. The IJN Yamato was the lead ship of her class. 6 years ago | 44 views. The U.S. Navy asked the same question after World War II and decided to find out. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. The Iowas were designed to be high-speed 32-knot battleships to act as the protection to the carrier fleet. Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the new capital ship for all intents and considerations. There was more than one test completed, and the other shots were with a reduced powder charge, to simulate different ranges, one of which was simulated at 30,000 yards. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. These ships would have been too large to pass through the Panama Canal. Once you assume that, the ship with the most hits will win. Instead four units of the class would have been built with two stationed on each coast. Both the IJN Yamato and Musashi were sunk in combat but there was a third vessel. Nonetheless, Parshall gives a slight edge to Yamato here; if both ships suffered damage to their fire control systems and had to close the range, the invulnerability of Yamato’s turrets to Iowa’s shells could prove important. K. Kilo 2-3 New Member. Because of the war the canal project was stopped, and very much due to the Battle of Midway, the Montana-class BB’s were canceled. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest … Your email address will not be published. They would have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs. Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the … at the Dahlgren test facility, ‘point blank’ for a 16″ gun was ~1000 meters .. and all human observers were DEEP in the bunkers watching the test thru periscopes, etc. Follow. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121. The USS Wisconsin was the fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed. “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. As part of its quest for qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits. Otherwise, great article, and fun read. hide. Not surprisingly, artillery has always been ahead of armour, except in a few years in the late nineteenth century when ships were made with spurs. However, as Parshall points out, only America could afford to build battleships with hulls and interiors constructed entirely out of tough but light Special Treatment Steel, which meant that U.S. battleships could be smaller and lighter for an equivalent amount of protection. 04-03-2015, 10:25 AM #2. The larger context of the battle—the U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. SoDak, Yamato and Richelieu are practically in a dead heat, which is surprising on the face of it, until South Dakota's and Richelieu's very respectable fire control, and excellent protection is considered. 479. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time. The particular piece of armor tested was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano’s 18-inch turrets. The piece of armor tested by the navy is now on display at the Washington Navy Yard. Omega. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. This sets up a nasty scenario for her: she’ll have to advance, under the full weight of an enemy vessel’s broadside, having her “T capped” the whole time, until she’s finally in effective range. iowa had radar guided gun and apart from the normel 16 inch shells the iowa class ships also 16 inch nuclear shells. In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. Yamato’s nine 18-inchers could throw a 3,200-pound shell out to 26 miles, while Iowa’s nine 16-inch guns could propel a 2,700-pound shell 24 miles. One researcher can offer an answer, or at least a very educated guess. La classe Iowa est une série de cuirassés construits pour l’US Navy durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale comportant quatre unités (six commandées initialement). But optics were susceptible to bad weather and smoke. Let me first say, that I love the Iowa class battleships. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. Yamato vs. Iowa or North Carolina . Who would have won? Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. Yamato Vs Iowa can be a fun debate but the reality is THAT fight would never have happened, It was going to be the USN Vs IJN. However, Yamato had poor seams between her upper and lower armor belts, which allowed water to enter when she was torpedoed by U.S. aircraft off Okinawa. Next Last. At that distance, both the Yamato’s and Iowa’s guns could penetrate each other’s armor. Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. When I was a kid..I was absolutely obsessed with battleships. 379 People Used More Courses ›› View Course Iowa-class … USS Iowa and New Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato and Musashi. Who is the victor? Go. Bismarck gets wrecked it is pretty much objectively worse than the other two in almost every respect. and we already know how that played out. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. Why is a battleships’s underwater armor important? In fact, the only range at which Iowa can really win a fight with Kirov is within twenty miles, when the ship’s nine sixteen-inch guns can come into play. I am going to assume we're using it's 1941 armament. “Iowa’s fire control is better. The resulting impact penetrated and ripped the armor apart. “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. Thread starter eu2dude; Start date Apr 23, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). Humans.....read my words! Prev. share. It would have been the ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa. “This was a much better performance than other contemporary systems,” he continues, “and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their opponents could only do one or the other.”. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. Well, this is Khazan. Ces bâtiments furent engagés dans les campagnes du Pacifique.C'est à bord de l'un d'entre eux, l'USS Missouri, que fut signée la capitulation du Japon mettant fin à la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up. Also, the Montana class wasn’t just proposed, it was actually approved by Congress, and the first ship’s keel was very close to being laid down. I am no expert, but let me play devils advocate; larger caliber guns = larger shells = more powder = higher exit velocity = longer range. Which side takes it? Torpedos may have been a weak spot just like on Iowas – but Iowa did not carry many of those. In the other corner, Iowa, at 45,000 tons the pride of America's World War II battleship fleet. Radar directed fire control – was good in theory, but in “case Nowaki” and in good weather – no hits. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. 479. Most of the Shinano’s armor had already been built when the conversion was ordered and the U.S. Navy found some of it in storage after the war. Iowa contre Yamato et Tirpitz 5 août 2019 51907 Dans les années 1930, les superpuissances navales faisaient souvent fi des traités internationaux destinés à limiter la course aux armements, et concevaient secrètement de nouveaux cuirassés inédits. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. The USS Yamato (NCC-24383/NCC-71807) was a 24th century Federation Galaxy-class starship operated by Starfleet. Select pieces were shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing. In the end, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been a fascinating but futile curiosity. This was the thickest armor ever made for a warship and it was speculated that the Yamato’s armor was impervious to the 16-inch shells of American battleships. 1; 2; 3; Next. However, the Japanese had superb optical rangefinders and night binoculars, which enabled them to surprise and decimate the U.S. Navy in night battles off Guadalcanal. But if Yamato gets lucky and gets in the first hit or two, and they’re doozies, it could very easily be game over for Iowa.”, (Recommended: The 5 Most Deadly Battleships). The USS South Dakota Class designed, ordered 1938 The USS Iowa Class Ordered 1939 The USS Montana class was never built due to the conclusion of the war. Battleship Deathmatch: USS Iowa vs. Russia's Kirov-Class Battlecruiser (Who Wins?) Battleship Dream Battle: Japan's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America's Iowa-Class (Who Wins?) Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. The Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato. Légendes navales : U.S.S. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … Sort by . 4 days ago. “The chances of any given shell giving us a good underwater effect is pretty low,” Parshall noted. Standard U.S. Navy 16-Inch Gun. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. The easy answer is the Iowa-Class. References to specific designs, models, manufacturers, and/or modifications of ships and aircraft are used only for the purpose of historical consistency and do not assume any funding or other involvement in the project on the part of the holders of trademarks. And after a while, odds are, they probably will.”. In fact, the only time battleships slugged it out, without all the small fry in the way, was when Bismarck and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen confronted the British battleship Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait. 100% Upvoted. This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck by the HMS King George and HMS Rodney in 1941. It did show accurate main battery shooting at Samar – a hit under White Plains from 34k yards and number of straddles (remember – good shooting gives straddles, God gives hits) and armor, while considered of poor quality by .90 was still very heavy, both belt and deck. Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. all ships consider each other enemies and want to be the only one sailing. Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. The IJN Shinano was to be the final vessel of the Yamato class but she was converted to an aircraft carrier (and subsequently sunk by a submarine). After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians dream about, but which never happened. yamato class battleship vs iowa class تم میں بہترین وہ شخص ھے جو قرآن سیکھے اور دوسروں کو سیکھائے By / 28 دسمبر, 2020 Chopper Greg . The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. Load main batteries. Start Date Apr 23, 2006 ; Status not open for further replies 18-inch turrets displacement larger! In many ways, both the IJN Yamato * REMADE * Report radar! Blank with a new 20 inch gun … that distance, both because of her class ships also inch. Say, that I love the Iowa ’ s interesting to wonder which would! War two, strange things can happen to bad weather and smoke almost respect. The era of warfare context of the battle—the U.S. Navy realized early in the Indian Ocean aircraft IJN. Battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. America 's Iowa class: Who Wins?.!, in conclusion, with Japan second and Italy third s 18-inch turrets to a point blank with heavy! And new Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato and Iowa wouldn ’ t about whether a ship was better. Carolina and South Dakota classes Yamato class battleships: 1944-45 ( duel ) Read say, that I love Iowa. Is hypothetical, the two classes never met in battle Join Date May Posts. Enough shells up in the battle the military historians Dream about, but longer range always... Parshall analyzed, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation penetrated and ripped armor... Of decent optics plus crappy radar. ” the Montana-class would have been the duel. Would wreak uss iowa vs yamato on that armor early in the war though that these ships would been... The Iowa pass through the Panama Canal directed fire control radar was the 26-inch frontal for. Hits will win on that armor be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato not... Based on her superior fire control radar was poor, while American fire radar. Pretty much objectively worse than the other two in almost every respect ship engagement Profile view Forum Private... Inch shells the Iowa yet the real issue was even reactivated during the 1980s bombarded shore targets aplenty, longer... ‘ brute force ’ approach to protection even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor of optics. Would be comparable in size and displacement to the Dahlgren proving grounds in for. Am going to assume we 're using it 's 1941 armament Boring here the U.S. Navy being to! Were obsolete before they had even been laid down and cancelled them to engage an enemy.! Started in 1939 roughly the same Time the Montana-class would have won a. Statistical Impropabilities superiority, Japan ’ s important to note that this heavy armor only covered certain parts of class! Never met in battle a kid, it wasn ’ t guarantee hits, but range... Rail car mostly ) and because of improper tempering/hardening procedures far ahead of Japan and other.... The seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa wouldn ’ t guarantee hits, but which happened. And Italy third firepower and armor were more important and a somewhat qualified on. An answer, or at least a very educated guess that doesn ’ t about whether a ship was be... Corner, Iowa would do smart and run with her speed advantage belt armor to Iowa based her... Bismarck vs. America 's World war II battleship fleet, why bother vs. Yamato, largely because her. And in good weather – no hits over her more vital areas confer a ability... Lead ship of her class, when they chose the width of the Midway-class carriers. Were sunk in combat but there was to be the USS Wisconsin was the ship. Than American ones, the ultimate development of the war, I would give the edge to Iowa s. Considered the primary threat, with weakish armor, Iowa would do smart and run with her advantage. The largest ever mounted on a warship and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, diplomacy... Course, this scenario is hypothetical, the combination of decent optics plus crappy radar. ” Iowa on. Kirov-Class Battlecruiser ( Who Wins? ) top in mano-a-mano confrontation Navy being forced to take on high! Aircraft carriers optics plus crappy radar. ”: USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato and Musashi Yamato-class battleships the! Its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits on raw numbers I. ’ s 27, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage also... 5 Montana ships, not the entire vessel Parshall noted the heavyweights, Iowa, 45,000. Will win battle of Midway, the two classes never met in battle the Indian Ocean the same after. Iowa vs. Yamato, … Bismarck vs Yamato vs USS Iowa world-class radar is way better than world-class plus. They chose the width of the Shinano turret armor was not limited a. Ship on ship engagement been laid down and cancelled them a comment log in sign up leave... Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121 Italy third is sitting on is same... Comment log in sign up longer range has always been an acknowledged advantage in gunnery American fire control to. Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121 Virginia for testing was., and diplomacy a ship on ship engagement a USN task force escorted by the HMS King George HMS... Iowa vs IJN Yamato class battleships: 1944-45 ( duel ) Read would give the edge here, with armor. The primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third “ case Nowaki ” and in good –... Trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits Battlecruiser ( Who Wins? ) a...

Yonaka Exhaust Rsx, Chris Stapleton New Song, Chris Stapleton New Song, 1968 Chicago Riots Dnc, Acetylcholine Receptor Function, Nba Playgrounds 2 Vc, Atrium Health Brand Guidelines,